Rihanna Spotted Heading to César Restaurant in Paris After Céline Dion Concert
By Rodrigo Santos Andrade
On the meaning of fairness for pensioners, and whether there is a kinder way to manage invasive species. Here’s an edited selection of your views.
Every day, we publish a selection of your emails in our newsletter. We’d love to hear from you, you can email us at [email protected].
Monday November 3
“In regards to the article ‘Exempting pensioners from private health rebate changes won’t make it fairer. Here’s what would,’ surely, after all those years of working so hard to achieve our goals, we shouldn’t have to worry about our pension. I wish politicians were more aware of this and understood the concerns of ordinary people, especially when you look at the pensions they receive and how comfortable they are in their retirement.”
Catherine Wall
“A comment on Euen Richie’s article, ‘Calling species ‘invasive’ – and culling them – isn’t done lightly. But it matters to Australia’s threatened species’. Whilst I’m not disputing the impact invasive animals and plants have on our native environment, it is not the fault of the animals or plants concerned. Yet, they are the ones being shot or poisoned. There was talk some years ago of introducing fertility control for certain invasive animals. Whatever happened to that?”
Marg Wheeler
Tags: Academic Journalism, The Conversation, The Conversation Academic News